ilyagram

「以後中國人們會記得，在 Microsoft，Yahoo! 跟 Google 背叛他們的時候， wikipedia 曾經跟他們站在一起，不離不棄…（後面沒有了）」

“the search engine that changes everything…. Just as Wikipedia revolutionized how we think about knowledge and the encyclopedia, we have a chance now to revolutionize how we think about search.”

…His vision for Search Wikia includes a desire to make its inner workings transparent in order to engender trust in its results. “I trust Google reasonably well,” he says, “but that’s like saying you have a favorite politician. I trust this politician, but I still want the city council to meet publicly.” Wales a man with principles too - he has never cooperated with China’s efforts to censor Wikipedia, whereas Google, Yahoo, and Microsoft have all acquiesced.

…Wales thinks that search should focusing on what people click on, and the content of web pages - in other words, search that acts in a human way - must give better results than a machine (and insiders say this is what Google is focusing on now). But how are you going to do it better and bigger than Google? Dave Winer, who pioneered RSS feeds for media distribution over the Internet, says “Even if there are reasons to believe that Wales’s effort will fail, I’m glad he’s trying.”

聽到 Jimmy Wales 述說他的 wikipedia 誕生與成長的故事，我覺得我就像是在 1913 年亨利福特在高地公園發表他的移動式生產線構想的前夕，聆聽他的故事。（接著是福特功績的描述）

…Listening to Jimmy Wales spin his tale of Wikipedia’s birth and growth I imagined was like listening to Henry Ford on the eve of his launching his moving assembly line at Highland Park in 1913. Until Ford came along car production had been an odd-ball activity.The US produced 7,000 cars a year,mainly from small workshops owned by rich people and they were then sold to other rich people.No one had dared think cars could be for the masses.They could not see how that might be done. But for most of that decade, Ford a renegade outsider and his team of engineers, had been experimenting with a fundamentally different approach to production,with the aim of creating a product for a mass market of mid-Western farmers.A bit like the encyclopaedias of today, the car workshops of 1913 used only skilled craftsmen to make bespoke products. Ford wanted to use a rag-bag army of barely literate workers to achieve the task.To most of the rest of the car industry it must have sounded crazy.Yet most of the ingredients of Ford’s mass production system were already around to be borrowed: the moving line came from the meat packing industry; the interchangeable parts came from the machine tool industry; the scheduling skills came from railroads. Ford’s genius was to understand how they could be brought together. Ford created a new way to see organisations: how to mobilise resources on a mass scale, to make standardised products for mass markets and in the process bring about far reaching social and economic changes.What Ford did for the industrial economy Jimmy Wales is doing for the knowledge economy. And like Ford he is doing it by borrowing ideas from many different sources.None of the organisational ingredients that make up Wikipedia are in themselves new: peer review comes from academia and science; the wiki was a tool developed elsewhere on the net; the encyclopedia is a well established form; the way Wikipedia settles disputes borrows from other, older communities; the barefoot philosophy of amateurs doing jobs previously reserved for professionals was pioneered by social entrepreneurs. What is new is the way that Wales and Wikipedia has put it all together. Even now most people cannot see how the mass of people could become participants in innovation rather than merely consumers. Yet just as Ford transformed the way we made products, so Wales and others of his ilk are transforming the way we create ideas, together.

Microsoft has landed in the Wikipedia doghouse today after it offered to pay an Australian blogger to change technical articles on the community-produced web encyclopedia site.

While Wikipedia is known as the encyclopedia that anyone can tweak, founder Jimmy Wales and his cadre of volunteer editors, writers and moderators have blocked public relations firms, campaign workers and anyone else perceived as having a conflict of interest from posting fluff or slanting entries.

So paying for Wikipedia copy is considered a definite no-no.（想死啊？）
“We were very disappointed to hear that Microsoft was taking that approach,” Wales said.

沒有人 pay 我，我為甚麼要去改 wiki 的條目？